2021
Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts four new cases
Madison, Wisconsin - November 24, 2021
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has voted to accept four new cases, and the Court acted to deny review in a number of other cases. The case numbers, counties of origin and the issues presented in granted cases are listed below. More information about pending appellate cases can be found on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Access website. Published Court of Appeals opinions can be found here, and the status of pending Supreme Court cases can be found here.
2020AP225 Pagoudis v. Keidl
Supreme Court case type: Petition for Review
Court of Appeals: District II
Circuit Court: Washington County, Judge Todd K. Martens, reversed
Long caption: Louis Pagoudis, Hanna Pagoudis, Sead Properties, LLC and Kearns Management, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Marcus Keidl and Russell K. Berg d/b/a Intervest Inspections, Defendants, Amy Keidl a/k/a Amy Jo Weyker, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner
Issues presented:
- Whether a seller of residential real estate can be held liable in perpetuity to a subsequent third-party purchaser or transferee for alleged misrepresentations in a Real Estate Condition Report issued on a s part of an earlier home sale.
- Whether an owner of residential real estate who transfers the property to a third party can recover for damages not incurred by the owner before transfer.
- Whether Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) are treated as separate legal entities even if they are owned by the same person.
2020AP1124 Murphy v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.
Supreme Court case type: Petition for Review
Court of Appeals: District IV
Circuit Court: Sauk County, Judge Michael P. Screnock, reversed
Long caption: Matthew W. Murphy, Plaintiff-Appellant, Wisconsin Power and Light Company, Involuntary-Plaintiff v. Columbus McKinnon Corporation, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner
Issues presented:
- Did the Wisconsin State legislature ("Legislature") eliminate application of the consumer-contemplation standard for design defect claims when it enacted Wis. Stat. § 895.047?
- If the Legislature did not eliminate application of the consumer-contemplation test, can a product, as a matter of law, be "unreasonable dangerous" where the risk was undisputedly obvious and foreseeable?
- In a products liability design defect case, can a factfinder reasonably base its verdict on ipse dixit expert testimony that is: (i) not based on testing despite the expert's ability to test, or; (ii) reliant on the circular inference that the accident itself is evidence of a design defect?
2019AP2184 State v. Moeser
Supreme Court case type: Petition for Review
Court of Appeals: District IV
Circuit Court: Portage County, Judge Robert J. Shannon, affirmed and remanded with directions
Long caption: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Jeffrey L. Moeser, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner
Issue presented: Whether the 'Oath' requirement under the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution and Article 1, Section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution require a police officer to swear an oath to the truthfulness of an affidavit used to obtain a search warrant to conduct an evidentiary blood draw in a criminal OWI matter?
2020AP1014-CR State v. Wilson
Supreme Court case type: Petition for Review
Court of Appeals: District I
Circuit Court: Milwaukee County, Judge David L. Borowski, affirmed
Long caption: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Christopher D. Wilson, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner
Issue presented: Did the police have implicit license to enter the backyard of Mr. Wilson's home through a gated privacy fence?
Review denied: The Supreme Court denied review in the following cases. As the state's law-developing court, the Supreme Court exercises its discretion to select for review only those cases that fit certain statutory criteria (see Wis. Stat. § 809.62). Except where indicated, these cases came to the Court via petition for review by the party who lost in the lower court:
2018AP1679 | Marquardt v. LIRC |
2018AP1725-CRNM | State v. Walters |
2018AP2444 | J.S. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Public Instruction |
2019AP244 | Barwick v. Barwick |
2019AP1023-CR | State v. Loga-Negru |
2019AP1077-CR | State v. Von Brown |
2019AP1130 | Hutchinson v. Kohner, Mann & Kailas, S.C. |
2019AP1253 | State v. Smith |
2019AP2020-CR | State v. Blair |
2020AP27 | Anderson v. LIRC |
2020AP76-CR 2020AP77-CR |
State v. Williams |
2020AP174 | State v. Dominguez |
2020AP261-CR | State v. Ross |
2020AP498-CR to 2020AP501-CR |
State v. Gutierrez |
2020AP694-CR | State v. Marinez |
2020AP701 | State v. Kharb |
2020AP722 | State v. Anderson |
2020AP840 | Schottler v. DOT |
2020AP919 | Zimmer v. Zimmer (Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley dissents) |
2020AP920-CR | State v. Jacques |
2020AP966 | Florence County v. P.G. |
2020AP1469-CR | State v. Christenson |
2020AP1502-CR | State v. Houston |
2021AP1019-W | Collier v. Hanson |
2015AP2027-CRNM | State v. Diaz |
2019AP1575 | MDS Enterprises v. Mid State Truck Svsc. |
2019AP1861 | McShan v. Hayes |
2020AP910 | State v. Davis |
2021APXX527-CR | State v. Nieminski |
Contact:
Tom Sheehan
Court Information Officer
(608) 261-6640