Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 15872 for commentating.
Search results 2931 - 2940 of 15872 for commentating.
State v. Daniel L. Newkirk - 2005AP002728
Cook’s testimony.” Newkirk contends that this was an improper comment, requiring a mistrial, and defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27161 - 2006-11-15
Cook’s testimony.” Newkirk contends that this was an improper comment, requiring a mistrial, and defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27161 - 2006-11-15
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Angela M. K. - 2012AP000578
from the concluding comment in the court’s oral decision: I don’t find a reason to upset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82885 - 2014-09-15
from the concluding comment in the court’s oral decision: I don’t find a reason to upset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82885 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Dixon - 2017AP001252
comments were “calculated.” Even so, Dixon was not prejudiced. The prosecutor described the sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214612 - 2018-06-27
comments were “calculated.” Even so, Dixon was not prejudiced. The prosecutor described the sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214612 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Kleser - 2004AP000062
.” The No. 2004AP0062-CR 4 circuit court then looked to the son’s comments to the presentence report writer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20679 - 2017-09-21
.” The No. 2004AP0062-CR 4 circuit court then looked to the son’s comments to the presentence report writer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20679 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles E. Kleser - 2004AP000062
court then looked to the son’s comments to the presentence report writer. Noting that it had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20679 - 2005-12-19
court then looked to the son’s comments to the presentence report writer. Noting that it had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20679 - 2005-12-19
State v. Charles R. C. - 2003AP002790
argument constituted a reasonable comment on Charles’ credibility. The prosecutor referred to Charles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6975 - 2005-03-31
argument constituted a reasonable comment on Charles’ credibility. The prosecutor referred to Charles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6975 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen C. Sherman - 2007AP000899
postconviction hearing, the court indicated that its comments did not reflect medical diagnoses, but were instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32154 - 2008-04-29
postconviction hearing, the court indicated that its comments did not reflect medical diagnoses, but were instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32154 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Stephen C. Sherman - 2007AP000899
, the court indicated that its comments did not reflect medical diagnoses, but were instead common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32154 - 2014-09-15
, the court indicated that its comments did not reflect medical diagnoses, but were instead common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32154 - 2014-09-15
State v. Russell K. Schreiber - 2000AP000148
speculates that the trial court’s comment that Schreiber confessed evinces bias against him. In context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2159 - 2005-03-31
speculates that the trial court’s comment that Schreiber confessed evinces bias against him. In context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2159 - 2005-03-31
Universal Foods Corporation v. Elizabeth A. Zande - 2001AP000111
the lawsuit against her if no further alleged defamatory comments were posted on the internet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3495 - 2005-03-31
the lawsuit against her if no further alleged defamatory comments were posted on the internet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3495 - 2005-03-31