Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9851 - 9860 of 67241 for had.
Search results 9851 - 9860 of 67241 for had.
Cedarburg Education Association v. Cedarburg Board of Education - 2007AP000852
that the Board had violated the CBA, which provides that no permanently employed teacher may be discharged except
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32269 - 2008-04-01
that the Board had violated the CBA, which provides that no permanently employed teacher may be discharged except
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32269 - 2008-04-01
[PDF]
State v. Jay G. Jacomet - 2021AP002186
the Cadillac went into the store and had difficulty standing and talking; and the district employee believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576266 - 2022-10-12
the Cadillac went into the store and had difficulty standing and talking; and the district employee believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576266 - 2022-10-12
R & L Transfer, Inc. v. Charles Bickford and Cleva Bickford - 2000AP000441
of lading contract with R&L for business equipment. Bickford, Inc.’s check for the delivery charge also had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2268 - 2005-03-31
of lading contract with R&L for business equipment. Bickford, Inc.’s check for the delivery charge also had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2268 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eugene W. Kosky - 2009AP000960
and there was no reasonable suspicion that a traffic regulation had been violated. We conclude that at the time of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40563 - 2014-09-15
and there was no reasonable suspicion that a traffic regulation had been violated. We conclude that at the time of the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40563 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerry A. Foskett - 2000AP000443
.” When asked whether he had been drinking, Foskett initially denied consuming any alcohol, but later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2269 - 2017-09-19
.” When asked whether he had been drinking, Foskett initially denied consuming any alcohol, but later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2269 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
R & L Transfer, Inc. v. Charles Bickford and Cleva Bickford - 2000AP000441
. Bickford, Inc.’s check for the delivery charge also had Charles and Cleva Bickford’s names at the top
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2268 - 2017-09-19
. Bickford, Inc.’s check for the delivery charge also had Charles and Cleva Bickford’s names at the top
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2268 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Adrian J. Guerrero - 2017AP000434
to a No. 2017AP434-CRNM 3 crime. Guerrero said he understood and acknowledged that he had reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195399 - 2017-09-21
to a No. 2017AP434-CRNM 3 crime. Guerrero said he understood and acknowledged that he had reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195399 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Deshawn D. Johnson - 2021AP001066
, indicating that he had witnessed the shooting and that someone named “Drew” or “Andrew” was the perpetrator
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682700 - 2023-07-26
, indicating that he had witnessed the shooting and that someone named “Drew” or “Andrew” was the perpetrator
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682700 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Harris - 2004AP000058
that the parties had agreed to certain facts and read the stipulation to the jury. ¶5 When it instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21064 - 2017-09-21
that the parties had agreed to certain facts and read the stipulation to the jury. ¶5 When it instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21064 - 2017-09-21
State v. Willie E. Harris - 2004AP000058
.” The record demonstrates that the circuit court explained to the jury that the parties had agreed to certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21064 - 2006-01-30
.” The record demonstrates that the circuit court explained to the jury that the parties had agreed to certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21064 - 2006-01-30