Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 981 - 990 of 18881 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 981 - 990 of 18881 for transfer by affidavit.
Christopher T. Beidel v. Sideline Software, Inc. - 2011AP000788
Beidel’s affidavit calls “a possible purchase of Sideline.” Hall discussed this with Beidel “on or about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78323 - 2012-03-27
Beidel’s affidavit calls “a possible purchase of Sideline.” Hall discussed this with Beidel “on or about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78323 - 2012-03-27
Martin J. Greenberg v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company - 1993AP003258
issue of fact, our inquiry shifts to the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7737 - 2005-03-31
issue of fact, our inquiry shifts to the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Martin J. Greenberg v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company - 1993AP003258
to the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7737 - 2017-09-19
to the moving party's affidavits or other proof to determine whether a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7737 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donald Lee v. Gary R. McCaughtry - 1996AP002719
not tell us, it appears that Holmes had been transferred to a different institution and was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11458 - 2017-09-19
not tell us, it appears that Holmes had been transferred to a different institution and was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11458 - 2017-09-19
Donald Lee v. Gary R. McCaughtry - 1996AP002719
appears in the record. It is a very brief affidavit, stating only that: he does not know Lee, he and Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11458 - 2005-03-31
appears in the record. It is a very brief affidavit, stating only that: he does not know Lee, he and Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11458 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David J. Decker v. Frederick J. Decker - 2004AP003112
by a different judge, states: “The Receiver is authorized to assign and transfer to [David] all interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27255 - 2014-09-15
by a different judge, states: “The Receiver is authorized to assign and transfer to [David] all interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27255 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Eric D. Carlson v. Fidelity Motor Group, LLC - 2014AP000695
submitted an affidavit. Exhibits submitted with Carlson’s affidavit include “screenshots” of Fidelity’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132956 - 2017-09-21
submitted an affidavit. Exhibits submitted with Carlson’s affidavit include “screenshots” of Fidelity’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132956 - 2017-09-21
Knox Enterprises, Inc., v. Cynthia K. Jetzer - 2009AP001671
to complete the machine. The circuit court authorized transfer of the machine to Knox and relieved Mesick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49739 - 2010-05-11
to complete the machine. The circuit court authorized transfer of the machine to Knox and relieved Mesick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49739 - 2010-05-11
Carl E. Merow v. Joseph J. Kox - 1996AP001756
the 706 form. Moreover, Merow’s affidavit opposing summary judgment alleges that he believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10990 - 2005-03-31
the 706 form. Moreover, Merow’s affidavit opposing summary judgment alleges that he believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10990 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Dental Group, S.C. v. Pete Kelley - 2011AP000592
damages. Because the counterclaims sought damages in excess of $5,000, the matter was transferred out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78011 - 2012-02-13
damages. Because the counterclaims sought damages in excess of $5,000, the matter was transferred out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78011 - 2012-02-13