Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9711 - 9720 of 38338 for indications.
Search results 9711 - 9720 of 38338 for indications.
[PDF]
State v. Peter R. Baumgarten - 1997AP000314
the arresting officer has information indicating an outstanding arrest warrant. See White v. Olig, 56 F.3d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12036 - 2017-09-21
the arresting officer has information indicating an outstanding arrest warrant. See White v. Olig, 56 F.3d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12036 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Craig R. Trenshaw - 2022AP000070
again emphasize that nothing in our prior order or this opinion should be read as indicating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
again emphasize that nothing in our prior order or this opinion should be read as indicating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762151 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Corey J. Uhlenberg - 2015AP000727
) Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Counsel for the appellant indicates that after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177055 - 2017-09-21
) Before Neubauer, C.J., Reilly, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Counsel for the appellant indicates that after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177055 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Curtis James Rumsey - 2019AP001372
but not addressed in the no- merit report. In response, appellate counsel indicates that a no-merit conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264319 - 2020-06-10
but not addressed in the no- merit report. In response, appellate counsel indicates that a no-merit conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264319 - 2020-06-10
State v. Jerrold T. McGuire - 1997AP002280
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12846 - 2005-03-31
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12846 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerrold T. McGuire - 1997AP002281
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12847 - 2005-03-31
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12847 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerrold T. McGuire - 1997AP002282
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12848 - 2005-03-31
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12848 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerrold T. McGuire - 1997AP002283
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12849 - 2005-03-31
indicated at the plea hearing that he understood the agreement, had read it, and had discussed it with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cedric L. Tung - 2019AP001383
-CRNM 2 review of the record. In response, appellate counsel indicates that he now believes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258584 - 2020-04-21
-CRNM 2 review of the record. In response, appellate counsel indicates that he now believes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258584 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick E. Jones - 2015AP001635
a supplemental no-merit addressing the potential issue. The supplemental no-merit report indicates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163341 - 2017-09-21
a supplemental no-merit addressing the potential issue. The supplemental no-merit report indicates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163341 - 2017-09-21