Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 961 - 970 of 68445 for did.
Search results 961 - 970 of 68445 for did.
State v. Randall M. Miller
in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of...
accepting Krivoshein’s no contest pleas. The Court: First of all, did anyone make any threat or use any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
accepting Krivoshein’s no contest pleas. The Court: First of all, did anyone make any threat or use any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 appeal, but he did not pursue an appeal.2 ¶3 In 2019, Whitaker filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458313 - 2021-12-01
for a WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 appeal, but he did not pursue an appeal.2 ¶3 In 2019, Whitaker filed a pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458313 - 2021-12-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that Garrett did not sufficiently prove that he was prejudiced. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
argues that Garrett did not sufficiently prove that he was prejudiced. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
defense expert witnesses; (2) the real controversy was not fully tried because her counsel did not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
defense expert witnesses; (2) the real controversy was not fully tried because her counsel did not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2007-08). He contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44738 - 2010-01-05
of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2007-08). He contends the arresting officer did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44738 - 2010-01-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not discuss the possibility of pleading not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158908 - 2017-09-21
did not discuss the possibility of pleading not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158908 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Combs
that Combs was not a sexually violent person did not show probable cause to believe that he was no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25713 - 2017-09-21
that Combs was not a sexually violent person did not show probable cause to believe that he was no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25713 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher L. Combs
] and determined that the re-examination report opining that Combs was not a sexually violent person did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25713 - 2006-07-25
] and determined that the re-examination report opining that Combs was not a sexually violent person did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25713 - 2006-07-25