Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 951 - 960 of 68445 for did.
Search results 951 - 960 of 68445 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea colloquy that she faced a fine of up to $20,000 when the maximum actually was $100,000; did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
the plea colloquy that she faced a fine of up to $20,000 when the maximum actually was $100,000; did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Davis that he did not work for him, and had called him a “joke.” Davis also stated that Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
Davis that he did not work for him, and had called him a “joke.” Davis also stated that Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
State v. Robert J. Capps
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did not understand the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12302 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the circuit court did not comply with the statutory requirements for granting Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
argues the circuit court did not comply with the statutory requirements for granting Constance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46877 - 2010-02-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The court noted that Hughes’ testimony showed that he did not operate a separate gravel business entity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30392 - 2014-09-15
. The court noted that Hughes’ testimony showed that he did not operate a separate gravel business entity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30392 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
did not undermine confidence in the verdict. ¶8 We reject Laboy’s appellate arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
did not undermine confidence in the verdict. ¶8 We reject Laboy’s appellate arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11053 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Charles Glynn
: Dissented: Not Participating: BABLITCH and PROSSER, J.J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17542 - 2011-02-14
: Dissented: Not Participating: BABLITCH and PROSSER, J.J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17542 - 2011-02-14
[PDF]
Richard Eggers v. Cumberland Farmers Union
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
that the conduct of the Eggers’ attorney, Bruce Scott Johnson, did not constitute mistake, inadvertence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11053 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frankie Groenke
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
of justice. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31