Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 98278 for circuit court.
Search results 9111 - 9120 of 98278 for circuit court.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Kenosha County: s. michael wilk, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100910 - 2013-08-14
of the circuit court for Kenosha County: s. michael wilk, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100910 - 2013-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. Soronen, Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82187 - 2012-05-08
. Soronen, Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82187 - 2012-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
Sokolski, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36102 - 2009-04-07
Sokolski, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36102 - 2009-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99630 - 2013-07-22
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99630 - 2013-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court denied the contempt motion on the grounds that Archer was misinterpreting Saffold’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111794 - 2014-05-07
. The circuit court denied the contempt motion on the grounds that Archer was misinterpreting Saffold’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111794 - 2014-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: jean a. dimotto and william w. brash, Judges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144334 - 2015-07-13
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: jean a. dimotto and william w. brash, Judges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144334 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63998 - 2011-05-11
-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63998 - 2011-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76444 - 2012-01-17
and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76444 - 2012-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Brown County: DONALD R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65224 - 2011-05-31
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Brown County: DONALD R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65224 - 2011-05-31

