Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 9081 - 9090 of 67241 for had.
Search results 9081 - 9090 of 67241 for had.
State v. Roosevelt Bennett - 2002AP000295
. He told the salesperson that he had $1000 to pay for the guns. When the salesperson told Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31
. He told the salesperson that he had $1000 to pay for the guns. When the salesperson told Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman R. - 2002AP001503
had a substantial parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5321 - 2005-03-31
had a substantial parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5321 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman R. - 2002AP001504
had a substantial parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
had a substantial parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5322 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman R. - 2002AP001505
had a substantial parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5323 - 2005-03-31
had a substantial parental relationship with the child. (b) In this subsection, “substantial parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tomius L. Curtain - 2008AP002087
No. 2008AP2087-CR 2 conclude the officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36146 - 2014-09-15
No. 2008AP2087-CR 2 conclude the officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36146 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph L. Young - 2005AP002598
, but has had his license to practice law administratively suspended since June 2004 for failure to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26021 - 2017-09-21
, but has had his license to practice law administratively suspended since June 2004 for failure to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26021 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph L. Young - 2005AP002598
of prior disciplinary proceedings, but has had his license to practice law administratively suspended since
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26021 - 2006-07-26
of prior disciplinary proceedings, but has had his license to practice law administratively suspended since
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26021 - 2006-07-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
witness—who had provided her name to dispatch—had called to report a “possibly intoxicated driver” who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
witness—who had provided her name to dispatch—had called to report a “possibly intoxicated driver” who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
witness—who had provided her name to dispatch—had called to report a “possibly intoxicated driver” who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
witness—who had provided her name to dispatch—had called to report a “possibly intoxicated driver” who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846984 - 2024-09-10
State v. Rock K. Ingram - 1995AP002964
from his arresting officer which the State used to show that Ingram had the motive and intent to elude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9882 - 2005-03-31
from his arresting officer which the State used to show that Ingram had the motive and intent to elude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9882 - 2005-03-31