Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 67241 for had.
Search results 8971 - 8980 of 67241 for had.
[PDF]
Shannen Elizabeth Richard v. Mark Joseph Rasmussen - 2020AP000332
, the parties had two minor daughters, ages sixteen and fourteen. ¶5 Both Shannen and Mark have associate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374518 - 2021-06-08
, the parties had two minor daughters, ages sixteen and fourteen. ¶5 Both Shannen and Mark have associate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374518 - 2021-06-08
Raymond L. Schneider v. Jacqueline G. Watley - 1995AP000505
testimony supporting her malpractice allegation. The expert witnesses she named had no opinions critical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8675 - 2005-03-31
testimony supporting her malpractice allegation. The expert witnesses she named had no opinions critical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary Kasar v. Peter Paly - 1998AP003459
case. The issue is whether the trial court properly dismissed the case because Kasar had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14853 - 2017-09-21
case. The issue is whether the trial court properly dismissed the case because Kasar had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14853 - 2017-09-21
State v. David W. Pender - 1996AP002807
claimed that he had a valid defense to the charges and now wanted to proceed to trial. He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11500 - 2005-03-31
claimed that he had a valid defense to the charges and now wanted to proceed to trial. He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11500 - 2005-03-31
Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon - 2002AP003041
concluded that modification was not appropriate because Julie had not shown an increased need. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5887 - 2005-03-31
concluded that modification was not appropriate because Julie had not shown an increased need. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Audell Hernandez - 1999AP001008
. He also claims that his counsel was ineffective by failing to inform him that he had an absolute
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15396 - 2017-09-21
. He also claims that his counsel was ineffective by failing to inform him that he had an absolute
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15396 - 2017-09-21
State v. Audell Hernandez - 1999AP001008
by failing to inform him that he had an absolute right to testify and that the decision was his alone to make
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15396 - 2005-03-31
by failing to inform him that he had an absolute right to testify and that the decision was his alone to make
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15396 - 2005-03-31
Mary Kasar v. Peter Paly - 1998AP003459
court properly dismissed the case because Kasar had not presented testimony from an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14853 - 2005-03-31
court properly dismissed the case because Kasar had not presented testimony from an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14853 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barry M. Jenkins - 2005AP000302
be substantially prejudiced by Jenkins' plea withdrawal. Therefore, the issues are whether Jenkins had a fair
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29703 - 2007-07-11
be substantially prejudiced by Jenkins' plea withdrawal. Therefore, the issues are whether Jenkins had a fair
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29703 - 2007-07-11
[PDF]
State v. Barry M. Jenkins - 2005AP000302
. Therefore, the issues are whether Jenkins had a fair and just reason to withdraw his plea and how
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29703 - 2014-09-15
. Therefore, the issues are whether Jenkins had a fair and just reason to withdraw his plea and how
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29703 - 2014-09-15