Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8931 - 8940 of 66937 for had.

Barb Company v. American States Insurance Company - 1995AP000325
that the fire was intentionally started. The jury heard expert testimony that a liquid substance had burned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8598 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Shields Rubber Corporation v. Popp Cement Tile Products, Inc. - 1995AP001202
the sales credit for defective goods Shields Rubber had purchased from and then returned to Popp Cement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8996 - 2017-09-19

Shields Rubber Corporation v. Popp Cement Tile Products, Inc. - 1995AP001202
the sales credit for defective goods Shields Rubber had purchased from and then returned to Popp Cement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8996 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Amsoil, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission - 1995AP003453
and information it had at the time it decided not to rehire her. LIRC's subsequent finding that Andren suffered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10104 - 2017-09-19

State v. Barry M. Jenkins - 2005AP000302
be substantially prejudiced by Jenkins' plea withdrawal. Therefore, the issues are whether Jenkins had a fair
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29703 - 2007-07-11

[PDF] State v. Barry M. Jenkins - 2005AP000302
. Therefore, the issues are whether Jenkins had a fair and just reason to withdraw his plea and how
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29703 - 2014-09-15

Raymond L. Schneider v. Jacqueline G. Watley - 1995AP000505
testimony supporting her malpractice allegation. The expert witnesses she named had no opinions critical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8675 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary Kasar v. Peter Paly - 1998AP003459
case. The issue is whether the trial court properly dismissed the case because Kasar had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14853 - 2017-09-21

State v. David W. Pender - 1996AP002807
claimed that he had a valid defense to the charges and now wanted to proceed to trial. He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11500 - 2005-03-31

Julie A. Kenyon v. Ralph C. Kenyon - 2002AP003041
concluded that modification was not appropriate because Julie had not shown an increased need. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5887 - 2005-03-31