Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8911 - 8920 of 14338 for probate.
Search results 8911 - 8920 of 14338 for probate.
State v. Michael Solomon - 1999AP000964
and thirty years of probation, to be served consecutively. ¶3 On June 7, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15371 - 2005-03-31
and thirty years of probation, to be served consecutively. ¶3 On June 7, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael Solomon - 1999AP000964
, as a repeater. He was sentenced to eighty years of imprisonment and thirty years of probation, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15371 - 2017-09-21
, as a repeater. He was sentenced to eighty years of imprisonment and thirty years of probation, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15371 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Reginald E. Sims - 2004AP001504
, with a consecutive term of five years of probation. ¶3 Sims did not appeal from the judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7544 - 2017-09-19
, with a consecutive term of five years of probation. ¶3 Sims did not appeal from the judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7544 - 2017-09-19
State v. Shawn R. Coleman - 1995AP000509
of probation to run consecutive to the other sentences. Although defense counsel recommended that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8679 - 2005-03-31
of probation to run consecutive to the other sentences. Although defense counsel recommended that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8679 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn R. Coleman - 1995AP000508
of probation to run consecutive to the other sentences. Although defense counsel recommended that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8678 - 2005-03-31
of probation to run consecutive to the other sentences. Although defense counsel recommended that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8678 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chandra D. Dennis - 1995AP001753
sentenced Dennis to a term of imprisonment and a consecutive period of probation and ordered restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9264 - 2005-03-31
sentenced Dennis to a term of imprisonment and a consecutive period of probation and ordered restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chandra D. Dennis - 1995AP001753
. The court sentenced Dennis to a term of imprisonment and a consecutive period of probation and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9264 - 2017-09-19
. The court sentenced Dennis to a term of imprisonment and a consecutive period of probation and ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9264 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Burgus - 1995AP000491
withheld sentence and placed Burgus on probation for three years with the conditions that he serve a seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8667 - 2005-03-31
withheld sentence and placed Burgus on probation for three years with the conditions that he serve a seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8667 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chandra D. Dennis - 1995AP001754
sentenced Dennis to a term of imprisonment and a consecutive period of probation and ordered restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9265 - 2005-03-31
sentenced Dennis to a term of imprisonment and a consecutive period of probation and ordered restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Estella Marie Iddings - 1996AP002710
of probation. Iddings claims that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing her because it based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31
of probation. Iddings claims that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing her because it based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11451 - 2005-03-31