Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8851 - 8860 of 38334 for indications.

[PDF] State v. Jamale A. Bonds - 2005AP000948
1997 through 2004. This information indicated that the defendant had been convicted of a felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19727 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jamale A. Bonds - 2005AP000948
from 1997 through 2004. This information indicated that the defendant had been convicted of a felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19727 - 2005-09-26

State v. Keyun Utsey - 2004AP002578
and indicated that [I] had not sentenced defendant on the basis of a belief that he was dealing cocaine.… Given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26

State v. Lamar S. Westbrook - 2005AP001729
of Justice card and that Westbrook indicated he understood them and did not want to speak with an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26889 - 2006-10-23

Clyde Winter v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue - 2005AP002376
with Winter pointing out the various uses of portions of the property. The DOR indicated at the informal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27663 - 2007-01-09

State v. Jeremy M. Wine - 1998AP001423
indicates that the trial court engaged in an extensive plea colloquy with Wine before accepting his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14041 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Daniel C. Krause - 1998AP002727
sobriety tests at Johnson’s direction, which indicated Krause was impaired. Krause also submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14532 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Menomonee Falls v. Thomas O'Neill - 1996AP003607
on Maple Road, not Menomonee Avenue as O’Neill indicated. Based on these observations, coupled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11859 - 2017-09-21

City of Durand v. Thomas William Dettinger - 1997AP000903
Cause." The trial court indicated that it had received the motions and chose not to respond to them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12288 - 2005-03-31

William Engelhart v. June C. Engelhart - 1997AP003667
. As indicated, however, there was nothing in the motion papers, or in counsel’s arguments on the motion, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13404 - 2005-03-31