Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 871 - 880 of 66218 for did.

State v. Brent O. Ehret - 2009AP000450
to Ehret five to seven minutes later. He testified that Ehret did not seem confused at this time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49063 - 2010-04-20

[PDF] State v. Ross Timothy Litke - 2013AP001606
the preliminary breath test did not have probable cause to do so. The State of Wisconsin appeals that decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108909 - 2017-09-21

John Borowski v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company - 2013AP000537
$3500, but Borowski rejected the offer, asserting that the amount did not properly compensate him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106060 - 2013-12-26

[PDF] John Borowski v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company - 2013AP000537
Borowski $3500, but Borowski rejected the offer, asserting that the amount did not properly compensate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106060 - 2017-09-21

State v. Javier Reyes Otero - 2010AP001622
postconviction motion for a new trial. We conclude that trial counsel was not ineffective and Otero did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98322 - 2013-06-25

State v. Ross Timothy Litke - 2013AP001606
that the police officer who administered the preliminary breath test did not have probable cause to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108909 - 2014-03-10

[PDF] State v. Joseph F. Brown - 2010AP000832
the officer’s vehicle. The officer had his headlights on, but he was positive he did not have his high-beam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55446 - 2014-09-15

State v. Juan Maldonado - 2011AP000243
in context, did not harm Maldonado. Accordingly, we affirm. Background ¶2 The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81562 - 2012-04-25

[PDF] State v. Douglas H. Stream - 2011AP002051
that his trial lawyer was ineffective because the lawyer: (1) did not object during the pre-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92203 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daniel J. Lewer - 2006AP001218
to withdraw his plea. Lewer claims that: (1) he did not consent to the pat-down search, and (2) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26