Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 841 - 850 of 20758 for warrants.

[PDF] State v. Sharon A. Dixon - 2001AP000261
against her; (2) her trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the search warrant affidavit was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3555 - 2017-09-19

State v. Sharon A. Dixon - 2001AP000261
warrant affidavit was insufficient to support a finding of probable cause; and (4) the search warrant did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3555 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jessica M. Randall - 2017AP001518
, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243158 - 2019-08-27

State v. Mark J. Nagel - 1998AP000702
had already moved out. The officers informed Nagel that there were warrants for his arrest for unpaid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13731 - 2005-03-31

State v. Aaron E. Applewhite - 2009AP001164
. The issue is whether the search warrant affidavit provided probable cause to search the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58626 - 2011-01-05

[PDF] State v. Aaron E. Applewhite - 2009AP001164
evidence. The issue is whether the search warrant affidavit provided probable cause to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58626 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Benny Odell Choice - 2016AP000245
was unlawfully arrested without a warrant or summons, so there was no personal jurisdiction over him; (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185396 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Chapter 11 - Regulation of Members of the State Bar
.] SCR 11.04 Suspension for nonpayment of support, noncompliance with subpoena or warrant. (1
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132534 - 2017-09-21

State v. Malcolm M. Mumm - 2000AP003448
, cannot be analyzed for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3415 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Malcolm M. Mumm - 2000AP003448
for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad, citing to Schmerber v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19