Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 841 - 850 of 15393 for probate.
Search results 841 - 850 of 15393 for probate.
[PDF]
State v. Leslie K. Dent
hearings was determined by Dent’s probation officer. He further claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15285 - 2017-09-21
hearings was determined by Dent’s probation officer. He further claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15285 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leslie K. Dent
hearings was determined by Dent’s probation officer. He further claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15284 - 2017-09-21
hearings was determined by Dent’s probation officer. He further claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15284 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. After revocation of his probation, Risch was sentenced to five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288793 - 2020-09-22
motion for postconviction relief. After revocation of his probation, Risch was sentenced to five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288793 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals judgments imposing sentences after the revocation of his probation. Birkholz also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
appeals judgments imposing sentences after the revocation of his probation. Birkholz also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241830 - 2019-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Levi Hogner
imposed and stayed a one-year jail sentence and placed Hogner on probation for two years. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12321 - 2017-09-21
imposed and stayed a one-year jail sentence and placed Hogner on probation for two years. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12321 - 2017-09-21
State v. Levi Hogner
on probation for two years. The court ignored the minimum mandatory thirty-day jail sentence plainly required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12321 - 2005-03-31
on probation for two years. The court ignored the minimum mandatory thirty-day jail sentence plainly required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12321 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a decision of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
a decision of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120143 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
three witnesses at the trial to the court. The first witness was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
three witnesses at the trial to the court. The first witness was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
of the Administrator of the Division of Hearings and Appeals that revoked Smith’s probation. We reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120143 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole agent for the State of Wisconsin. He testified as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53769 - 2014-09-15
was Dave Kaczmarek, a probation and parole agent for the State of Wisconsin. He testified as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53769 - 2014-09-15