Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 8341 - 8350 of 67241 for had.

State v. Milton F. Pozo - 1998AP001394
that a copy had been sent to Pozo. In compliance with Anders, both Attorney Cushing and this court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14022 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Christ Groh - 1998AP002957
of his blood was drawn approximately five hours after he had driven his truck into the ditch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14635 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Milton F. Pozo - 1998AP001394
., and reported that a copy had been sent to Pozo. In compliance with Anders, both Attorney Cushing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14022 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dale G. Latus v. James Johnson - 1997AP001172
to identify all damages he sustained, Latus responded “not applicable.” Although Johnson had asked Latus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12395 - 2017-09-21

Dale G. Latus v. James Johnson - 1997AP001172
sustained, Latus responded “not applicable.” Although Johnson had asked Latus to produce his state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12395 - 2005-03-31

State v. William Medina - 1997AP003606
on appeal. Medina claimed that his attorney had informed him that if he were acquitted on all charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13376 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke - 1998AP001556
that the trial court erred by admitting evidence at trial that he had refused a chemical test of his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14092 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet - 2004AP002998
. Attorney Pierquet did not inform either R.G. or his own colleague that he had stipulated to dismissal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20066 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet - 2004AP002998
colleague that he had stipulated to dismissal of the case. ¶15 In September 2003 Attorney Pierquet's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24

State v. Bradley W. Sexton - 2010AP002054
by a uniformed officer. At the beginning of voir dire, the court asked the prospective jurors whether anyone had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71225 - 2011-09-26