Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 761 - 770 of 14293 for probate.
Search results 761 - 770 of 14293 for probate.
[PDF]
State v. Garrett A.B. - 1998AP001502
will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation of any of the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation of any of the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James E. Curtis v. Brian Hayes - 2021AP000883
court order affirming the revocation of his probation on certiorari review. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
court order affirming the revocation of his probation on certiorari review. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
State v. Justin D. Gudgeon - 2005AP001528
. In this case, the circuit court made known in writing that it wanted Justin D. Gudgeon’s probation extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25462 - 2006-07-25
. In this case, the circuit court made known in writing that it wanted Justin D. Gudgeon’s probation extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25462 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
State v. Justin D. Gudgeon - 2005AP001528
Justin D. Gudgeon’s probation extended before the extension hearing even took place. Gudgeon claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25462 - 2017-09-21
Justin D. Gudgeon’s probation extended before the extension hearing even took place. Gudgeon claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25462 - 2017-09-21
Trust of Rene von Schleinitz v. Edith Maclay - 2008AP000677
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
State v. Thomas William Koeppen - 1996AP001260
stayed these sentences and ordered Koeppen to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10772 - 2005-03-31
stayed these sentences and ordered Koeppen to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10772 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas William Koeppen - 1996AP001260
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Guy Norman Maras - 2020AP000762
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Frances Nienhardt - 1994AP003051
-2- her to stay out of the city of Cedarburg during the duration of her probation. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8285 - 2017-09-19
-2- her to stay out of the city of Cedarburg during the duration of her probation. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8285 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frances Nienhardt - 1994AP003051
probation. We affirm the judgment because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
probation. We affirm the judgment because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31