Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7441 - 7450 of 66937 for had.

[PDF] D. T. S. v. B. E. C. - 2023AP001081
of D.T.S. According to B.E.C.’s later testimony, this was because B.E.C. had left her mother’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711420 - 2023-10-05

[PDF] Lori Long v. Mohammad Ardestani - 2000AP001429
as grounds for the motion that Ardestani had repeatedly stated his intentions to take the children to Iran
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2637 - 2017-09-19

State v. Larry A. Tiepelman - 2004AP000914
Tiepelman's presentence investigation report (PSI), which had correctly documented his criminal background
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to have lost a lot of blood and “blacked out” as a result, and therefore did not know how B.S.R. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738911 - 2023-12-12

Alyson Marklein v. Horizon Investments - 1997AP003513
constructively evicted from the apartment and that Horizon, the landlord, had failed to meet its burden to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13339 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alyson Marklein v. Horizon Investments - 1997AP003513
and that Horizon, the landlord, had failed to meet its burden to show that it provided the required notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13339 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Hajji Y. McReynolds - 2007AP000883
the psychologist had a conflict of interest and McReynolds’ trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33590 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dane County Planning & Development v. Greg Griswold - 2009AP001594
discretion in dismissing this action without prejudice because he was prejudiced by the dismissal, he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52098 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kevin L. C. - 2002AP000629
The State’s evidence consisted primarily of testimony from four witnesses. Melissa testified that Kevin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31

Timothy C. Gahagan v. Scott W. Jakubowski - 1996AP001832
refer to it as the “lakefront parcel,” had frontage along the lake. The other parcel, we call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11031 - 2005-03-31