Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 46579 for adult name change.

State v. Philip J. Foster
, several adult women came forward with information that Foster had sexual contact with them when they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Eric W. Kruger v. Christina L. Kruger
child support until the older children left home. The children are now adults. No. 99-3223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16296 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
the juvenile court to the adult court system, where he was charged with first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31859 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
to § 904.04(2) because it shows Myriah’s “motive to lie about an adult with whom she is displeased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35696 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
Myriah’s “motive to lie about an adult with whom she is displeased” and because it shows “a pattern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35696 - 2009-03-02

[PDF] State v. Lee A. Sutton
interested in sexual relations with a child than with an adult.” Sutton testified about his dysfunction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12802 - 2017-09-21

Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
”) to provide temporary protective services for children when the custodial adult is unavailable. Glinder Drake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11569 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
(“MCDHS”) to provide temporary protective services for children when the custodial adult is unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11569 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
converted to survivorship benefits with his second wife, the respondent Mary Diedrich (Diedrich), named
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16581 - 2017-09-21

Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
with his second wife, the respondent Mary Diedrich (Diedrich), named as the beneficiary. The court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16581 - 2005-03-31