Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7181 - 7190 of 68957 for had.

State v. Nathan Dulin
that the fifteen-year-old Melvin told the police that in January 1994 Dulin had anal intercourse with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11097 - 2005-03-31

Valley Bank Northeast v. Angela L. Barta
on a promissory note Barta had given Valley Bank, Northeast, to borrow the $100,000 she invested in LaCount's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9040 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
, that Tondalia had failed to assume parental responsibility. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2), (6). After a hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92926 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
officials had been informed by a Stanley police officer that there was water running across the highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21

State v. Randy S. Simplot
averring, among other things, that: (1) he had assisted an undercover police officer buying crack cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3303 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jesse N. Pearson
that Pearson had been threatened by the No. 97-1525-CR 2 person who identified him by name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12533 - 2017-09-21

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
to require protective placement, and that the Dane County Department of Human Services had made reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15067 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy J. Lee
was wearing a knee-length leather coat. Prior to arriving at the store, Lee had been across the street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
as Buesgens and his friend, Paul Stutelberg. Mork observed that both drivers had “a fixed stare, wide-eyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80137 - 2012-03-26

[PDF] State v. Joshua A. Propst
of probation without a request from him or another party. We conclude the trial court had the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14188 - 2014-09-15