Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71 - 80 of 823 for bm.

[PDF] 2023 OWI Guidelines - District 9
and above. III. 346.65(2)(bm) provides for a reduced mandatory minimum 5 days jail with probation
/publications/fees/docs/d9owi2023.pdf - 2023-12-22

[PDF] 2024 OWI guidelines - District 9
and above. III. 346.65(2)(bm) provides for a reduced mandatory minimum 5 days jail with probation
/publications/fees/docs/d9owi2024.pdf - 2024-03-19

[PDF] Michael J. Landwehr v. Bernadette N. Landwehr - 2003AP002555
. Wis. Stat. § 767.24(5)(am)(1) to (16). In addition, Wis. Stat. § 767.24(5)(bm) addresses cases
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25427 - 2017-09-21

Michael J. Landwehr v. Bernadette N. Landwehr - 2003AP002555
, the court shall consider each case on the basis of the factors in sub. (5)(am), subject to sub. (5)(bm
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25427 - 2006-06-05

State v. Cesar G. - 2002AP002106
as provided in par. (bm)," if a juvenile is adjudicated delinquent on the basis of a violation under chapters
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16656 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Cesar G. - 2002AP002106
(15m)(am), which states that "except as provided in par. (bm)," if a juvenile is adjudicated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16656 - 2017-09-21

Richland County v. Franklin Farmers' Mutual Ins. Co. - 2007AP001682
).[2] The County argued that, under Wis. Stat. § 803.03(2)(bm),[3] Sheire’s attorney should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33677 - 2008-08-06

[PDF] State v. Shawn M. Boettcher - 2006AP002059
. …. (bm) A court shall hold a hearing on a motion made by a person under par. (b) or s. 51.20 (13) (ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28323 - 2014-09-15

State v. Shawn M. Boettcher - 2006AP002059
the person to comply with the reporting requirements under this section. …. (bm) A court shall hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28323 - 2007-03-05

[PDF] Richland County v. Franklin Farmers' Mutual Ins. Co. - 2007AP001682
)(bm),3 Sheire’s attorney should have represented Richland County’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33677 - 2014-09-15