Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 691 - 700 of 66218 for did.
Search results 691 - 700 of 66218 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Paul D. Martin - 2002AP002755
answered “No.” Martin did not state why he would not take the breath test, but offered to take a urine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5773 - 2017-09-19
answered “No.” Martin did not state why he would not take the breath test, but offered to take a urine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5773 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul D. Martin - 2002AP002755
breath and Martin answered “No.” Martin did not state why he would not take the breath test, but offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5773 - 2005-03-31
breath and Martin answered “No.” Martin did not state why he would not take the breath test, but offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001057
that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in WIS. STAT. § 976.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in WIS. STAT. § 976.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Calvin L. Brown - 2012AP000236
the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree. Party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89425 - 2014-09-15
the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree. Party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89425 - 2014-09-15
State v. Calvin L. Brown - 2012AP000236
because the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18
because the trial court did not explain party to a crime liability during his plea hearing. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001055
that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in WIS. STAT. § 976.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in WIS. STAT. § 976.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001059
that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in WIS. STAT. § 976.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in WIS. STAT. § 976.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles M. Pietluck - 2006AP001776
by the victim to various people after the victim had testified that she did not remember any of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
by the victim to various people after the victim had testified that she did not remember any of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16
[PDF]
State v. David S. Ware, Jr. - 2008AP002535
conversation to the detectives, the detectives did not log the recording as evidence. The recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47193 - 2014-09-15
conversation to the detectives, the detectives did not log the recording as evidence. The recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47193 - 2014-09-15
State v. Howard D. Platt - 1997AP003232
because: (1) the officer did not articulate a reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle, (2) the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13232 - 2005-03-31
because: (1) the officer did not articulate a reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle, (2) the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13232 - 2005-03-31