Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6871 - 6880 of 37274 for affidavit of mailing.

[PDF] State v. Thomas H. Highman - 2001AP000734
to schedule a trial date and mail the notice to him. Highman also notes that a call from his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3736 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] LMMIA, LLC v. State of Wisconsin, Division of Hearings and Appeals - 2005AP001096
by the applicant within 30 days after the notice is mailed to the applicant, the division of hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25716 - 2017-09-21

American Total Security, Inc. v. Geneva Schultz - 2004AP003147
solicitation away from the regular place of business of the seller, mail or telephone solicitation away from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19744 - 2005-09-26

Kenneth Onapolis v. State - 2005AP000877
order. Subsequently, Onapolis was convicted in Ohio of mail fraud and served a term of confinement. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30

River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher - 1995AP000148
that before the Bank mailed the titles to Fisher, she had a "meaningful choice." Therefore, the appellate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16980 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] River Bank of De Soto v. Raymond Fisher - 1995AP000148
that before the Bank mailed the titles to Fisher, she had a "meaningful choice." Therefore, the appellate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16980 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the verdict because it was mailed on the due date, and the parties’ filings were previously treated as timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43609 - 2009-11-16

[PDF] Link Snacks, Inc. v. Jay E. Link - 2008AP002897
verdict was, in fact, filed within twenty days of the verdict because it was mailed on the due date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43609 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James E. Hammis - 2012AP000818
it to Attorney Hammis on August 24, 2005. The itemized bill of costs was repeatedly mailed to Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135152 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James E. Hammis - 2012AP000818
24, 2005. The itemized bill of costs was repeatedly mailed to Attorney Hammis—at least 26 times
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135152 - 2015-02-16