Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 14335 for probate.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 14335 for probate.
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon M. Mark - 2013AP002328
sentenced him to two years’ probation, consecutive to case No. 2010CF186. It also imposed and stayed one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141397 - 2017-09-21
sentenced him to two years’ probation, consecutive to case No. 2010CF186. It also imposed and stayed one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141397 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Nikila N. Hennings - 2020AP000048
years of probation, with the length of any incarceration and conditions of probation left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541846 - 2022-07-12
years of probation, with the length of any incarceration and conditions of probation left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541846 - 2022-07-12
State v. Geraldine A. Molzner - 1999AP000312
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rohit Chand - 2014AP001874
successful completion and discharge from probation. ¶5 Chand was discharged from probation in 2012. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
successful completion and discharge from probation. ¶5 Chand was discharged from probation in 2012. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130022 - 2014-11-24
State v. Dean A. Molzner - 1999AP000311
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15090 - 2005-03-31
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vincent G. Tanner - 2009AP001068
then expressly considered and rejected probation because it “would unduly depreciate the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50287 - 2014-09-15
then expressly considered and rejected probation because it “would unduly depreciate the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50287 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rohit Chand - 2014AP001874
and discharge from probation. ¶5 Chand was discharged from probation in 2012. ¶6 On March 7, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130022 - 2017-09-21
and discharge from probation. ¶5 Chand was discharged from probation in 2012. ¶6 On March 7, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary Klauser v. Robert Schmitz - 2002AP003260
as personal representative of the estate. ¶3 Mrs. Schmitz’s will was admitted to probate without objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5955 - 2017-09-19
as personal representative of the estate. ¶3 Mrs. Schmitz’s will was admitted to probate without objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5955 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dunn County Department of Human Services v. Jeffrey S. - 2001AP000503
since the spring of 1998 for absconding from probation.2 Jeffrey contested the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3643 - 2017-09-19
since the spring of 1998 for absconding from probation.2 Jeffrey contested the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3643 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Demitrius Goodlow - 2005AP000619
probation. Since Goodlow has failed to brief the alleged errors by the trial court, these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20359 - 2017-09-21
probation. Since Goodlow has failed to brief the alleged errors by the trial court, these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20359 - 2017-09-21