Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 35954 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 6601 - 6610 of 35954 for affidavit of mailing.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
writer that Jones was actually the shooter. He submitted an affidavit from Jones confessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270980 - 2020-07-21
writer that Jones was actually the shooter. He submitted an affidavit from Jones confessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270980 - 2020-07-21
State v. Jerome Sellars
’ motion for postconviction relief was accompanied by the affidavit of postconviction counsel, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
’ motion for postconviction relief was accompanied by the affidavit of postconviction counsel, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violation occurs when an averment in an affidavit submitted in support of a search warrant is either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145295 - 2017-09-21
violation occurs when an averment in an affidavit submitted in support of a search warrant is either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145295 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as required by § 893.82. ¶6 In support of his motion to dismiss, Switalla submitted an affidavit of Betty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175770 - 2017-09-21
as required by § 893.82. ¶6 In support of his motion to dismiss, Switalla submitted an affidavit of Betty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175770 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
on the factors in SCR 20:1.5. Id.[6] ¶42 In this case, Thermal Design submitted the affidavits of the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28070 - 2007-02-07
on the factors in SCR 20:1.5. Id.[6] ¶42 In this case, Thermal Design submitted the affidavits of the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28070 - 2007-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
the affidavits of the two attorneys who successively prosecuted the action, Kendall Harrison and Thaddeus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28070 - 2014-09-15
the affidavits of the two attorneys who successively prosecuted the action, Kendall Harrison and Thaddeus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28070 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with prejudice. ¶13 The Liskas’ counsel subsequently filed an affidavit of costs and reasonable attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682694 - 2023-07-25
with prejudice. ¶13 The Liskas’ counsel subsequently filed an affidavit of costs and reasonable attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682694 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Colby first learned that the bridge was being replaced. Frederick avers in an affidavit that he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796476 - 2024-05-02
Colby first learned that the bridge was being replaced. Frederick avers in an affidavit that he told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796476 - 2024-05-02
F.R. v. T.B.
significant piece of evidence that he sought to have excluded was F.R.’s fifty-six paragraph affidavit, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13779 - 2005-03-31
significant piece of evidence that he sought to have excluded was F.R.’s fifty-six paragraph affidavit, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13779 - 2005-03-31