Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6551 - 6560 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 6551 - 6560 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
ABKA Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE December 10, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11954 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE December 10, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11954 - 2017-09-21
ABKA Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE December 10, 1997 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11954 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED NOTICE December 10, 1997 This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11954 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the status conference indicate that Moore failed to appear, and that the court in that case set an “Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102001 - 2013-09-16
the status conference indicate that Moore failed to appear, and that the court in that case set an “Order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102001 - 2013-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
At trial, after the State rested its case-in-chief, the prosecutor informed the court that he had learned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96841 - 2013-05-15
At trial, after the State rested its case-in-chief, the prosecutor informed the court that he had learned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96841 - 2013-05-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2024AP240-CR 5 testified that she routinely reviews the circuit court’s online docket—CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058378 - 2026-01-06
). No. 2024AP240-CR 5 testified that she routinely reviews the circuit court’s online docket—CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058378 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 17, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137500 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 17, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137500 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 13, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
did not have a constitutional right to a court-appointed attorney in his civil case. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132809 - 2015-01-12
did not have a constitutional right to a court-appointed attorney in his civil case. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132809 - 2015-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
conference. There were nine TPR cases set for trial on December 8, 2008, and the trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-03-26
conference. There were nine TPR cases set for trial on December 8, 2008, and the trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80017 - 2012-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 16, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 16, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court within the thirty-day limitation period of § 68.13(1). ¶5 In this case, it is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56175 - 2010-11-01
court within the thirty-day limitation period of § 68.13(1). ¶5 In this case, it is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56175 - 2010-11-01