Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6521 - 6530 of 37274 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 6521 - 6530 of 37274 for affidavit of mailing.
COURT OF APPEALS
placed from Burris’s home phone to the phone of her friend at 5:31 p.m. and 6:25 p.m.; affidavits from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
placed from Burris’s home phone to the phone of her friend at 5:31 p.m. and 6:25 p.m.; affidavits from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100948 - 2013-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29
typically give “great deference” to a magistrate’s determination that an affidavit for a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145295 - 2015-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violation occurs when an averment in an affidavit submitted in support of a search warrant is either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145295 - 2017-09-21
violation occurs when an averment in an affidavit submitted in support of a search warrant is either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145295 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl - 2012AP000582
that it was not made by a detached and neutral judge and based on the lack of a sworn affidavit supporting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91835 - 2014-09-15
that it was not made by a detached and neutral judge and based on the lack of a sworn affidavit supporting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91835 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as required by § 893.82. ¶6 In support of his motion to dismiss, Switalla submitted an affidavit of Betty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175770 - 2017-09-21
as required by § 893.82. ¶6 In support of his motion to dismiss, Switalla submitted an affidavit of Betty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
writer that Jones was actually the shooter. He submitted an affidavit from Jones confessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270980 - 2020-07-21
writer that Jones was actually the shooter. He submitted an affidavit from Jones confessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270980 - 2020-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s ruling. In doing so, we noted that Ward had “not submitted affidavits from any of the [witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
court’s ruling. In doing so, we noted that Ward had “not submitted affidavits from any of the [witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108920 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
Estate of Roberto Placido Sandoval v. Bright Dental - 2020AP001826
to Bright Dental 1, LLC. Attached to the second amended complaint, Sandoval included an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03
to Bright Dental 1, LLC. Attached to the second amended complaint, Sandoval included an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
Thermal Design, Inc. v. Project Coordinators, Inc. - 2005AP002777
the affidavits of the two attorneys who successively prosecuted the action, Kendall Harrison and Thaddeus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28070 - 2014-09-15
the affidavits of the two attorneys who successively prosecuted the action, Kendall Harrison and Thaddeus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28070 - 2014-09-15
Thermal Design, Inc. v. Project Coordinators, Inc. - 2005AP002537
on the factors in SCR 20:1.5. Id.[6] ¶42 In this case, Thermal Design submitted the affidavits of the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28070 - 2007-02-07
on the factors in SCR 20:1.5. Id.[6] ¶42 In this case, Thermal Design submitted the affidavits of the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28070 - 2007-02-07