Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6501 - 6510 of 68943 for had.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of this appeal,[2] Dukes moved to withdraw his pleas, claiming that he had not understood the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27588 - 2006-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
and a claim of strict responsibility misrepresentation. Both alleged the Kleinheinzes had failed to inform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27485 - 2006-12-18

[PDF] State v. Keith Banks
counsel for Banks's co-defendant argued, in essence, that the victim had not been sexually assaulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9525 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
residence after having an argument with her. Laura went to James Zeise’s apartment and told him she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32065 - 2008-03-10

COURT OF APPEALS
that he had received his Miranda rights. The officer then told Corrao that he was there to speak to him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33209 - 2008-06-24

[PDF] State v. Alec C. Christensen
. The deputies determined that several of the persons at the residence were juveniles who had been drinking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2143 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Adrian E. Stodola
witnesses and to show that the transcript yielded nothing to indicate Stodola had possessed the controlled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15

City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). The sole issue on appeal is whether the arresting officer had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3628 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mark David Hayter
, and potting soil. During police questioning the next day, Hayter admitted that he had been growing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6040 - 2017-09-19

State v. Donald F. Sheffey
court erred in concluding that he had not established a presumption of vindictiveness. “[T]he United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26