Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 651 - 660 of 38577 for indications.

State v. George C. Harrell - 2001AP001945
court’s sentencing discussion establishes that it relied on inaccurate statements in the PSI, indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James R. Bolstad - 1995AP000066
to protect the public. It also indicated that it believed an extended time in prison would assist Bolstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8482 - 2017-09-19

State v. William C. Hartwig - 1995AP000177
argues that the waiver was not voluntary because the trial court indicated that he did not qualify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8532 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James R. Bolstad - 1995AP000127
to protect the public. It also indicated that it believed an extended time in prison would assist Bolstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8510 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. William C. Hartwig - 1995AP000177
-3- the trial court indicated that he did not qualify for the appointment of another attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8532 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kurtis M. Willems - 2006AP001253
to withdraw the plea which indicates a swift change of heart. See id. at 290. ¶7 At the outset we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29035 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kurtis M. Willems - 2006AP001253
filing of the motion to withdraw the plea which indicates a swift change of heart. See id. at 290. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29035 - 2007-05-15

State v. Sean M. Daley - 2005AP000048
that shall be in a deferred prosecution agreement, there is no indication these are to be the sole components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09

[PDF] State v. Sean M. Daley - 2005AP000048
certain components that shall be in a deferred prosecution agreement, there is no indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20346 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel J. McDermott - 2013AP001645
. There is no indication in the record, however, that the jurors were statutorily, subjectively or objectively biased. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133565 - 2015-01-26