Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6471 - 6480 of 68458 for did.
Search results 6471 - 6480 of 68458 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
revocation and consuming alcohol. Richer, pro se, did not contest his revocation. Because Judge Proctor had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
revocation and consuming alcohol. Richer, pro se, did not contest his revocation. Because Judge Proctor had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
WI App 76 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP307-CR Complete Titl...
increasing the penalty for the misdemeanor offense involved in that case, did not change the “status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96029 - 2013-06-25
increasing the penalty for the misdemeanor offense involved in that case, did not change the “status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96029 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the prosecutor did not engage in purposeful discrimination is not clearly erroneous, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684579 - 2023-08-02
that the prosecutor did not engage in purposeful discrimination is not clearly erroneous, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684579 - 2023-08-02
State v. Aaron Leslie Harmer
that § 948.025 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied. He also complains that the court did not permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2155 - 2005-03-31
that § 948.025 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied. He also complains that the court did not permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2155 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Fears named two expert witnesses, Thomas Dudley and Paul Lau. The notice did not describe Dudley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41678 - 2014-09-15
Fears named two expert witnesses, Thomas Dudley and Paul Lau. The notice did not describe Dudley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41678 - 2014-09-15
State v. Russell L. Rose
agreement did not indicate that the dismissed charges would be read-in at sentencing. ¶5 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
agreement did not indicate that the dismissed charges would be read-in at sentencing. ¶5 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
claims that his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation because she: (1) did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29
claims that his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation because she: (1) did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78627 - 2012-02-29
COURT OF APPEALS
postdisposition motions. DISCUSSION ¶6 Crystal first argues the circuit court did not follow the procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36582 - 2009-05-26
postdisposition motions. DISCUSSION ¶6 Crystal first argues the circuit court did not follow the procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36582 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
now claims that the trial court did not engage in the proper colloquy regarding his no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6379 - 2017-09-19
now claims that the trial court did not engage in the proper colloquy regarding his no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6379 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
the trial court's intervention ruling; (2) the evidence did not show that Mahler was the perpetrator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
the trial court's intervention ruling; (2) the evidence did not show that Mahler was the perpetrator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19