Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6461 - 6470 of 68943 for had.

[PDF] Chrysler Financial Company, LLC v. Suzanne M. Falter
complaint for replevin. Because this court agrees with the circuit court that Falter had not obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4378 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Properties, arguing that he and Advanced Properties had not been properly served. The circuit court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71486 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Dennis Braun was not their landlord but rather that Michael Braun had given his father roughly half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887424 - 2024-12-11

[PDF] Joshua Slagoski v. Phil Kingston
cord to heat food. The prison disciplinary committee found that Slagoski “had knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4948 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Donald J. Dockry
officer had sufficient probable cause to arrest. This court agrees and therefore reverses the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2863 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Paul H. Gates
is whether the police had grounds to stop Gates and search his vehicle (where the marijuana was found). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9826 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that Hughes had physical possession of the drugs prior to his arrest. Whether the State presented sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063758 - 2026-01-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that she had sexual intercourse with the child or that the child was younger than sixteen years old—she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101620 - 2017-09-21

Herbert E. Droste v. David H. Schwarz
that Droste had violated the conditions of his parole. The DOC subsequently notified Droste that it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15671 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald J. Dockry
argues that the trial court erred by concluding that the arresting officer had sufficient probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2863 - 2005-03-31