Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6381 - 6390 of 19263 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 6381 - 6390 of 19263 for transfer by affidavit.
Carlos Frum v. Lee I. Wigod
to vacate the default judgment. Thereafter, counsel for Wigod filed a notice of appearance and an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10366 - 2005-03-31
to vacate the default judgment. Thereafter, counsel for Wigod filed a notice of appearance and an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10366 - 2005-03-31
Griffin & Brand of McAllen, Inc. v. Richard H. Gumz
. [1] GB provided an affidavit to the trial court from Patterson’s attorney stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10710 - 2005-03-31
. [1] GB provided an affidavit to the trial court from Patterson’s attorney stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10710 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Carlos Frum v. Lee I. Wigod
filed a notice of appearance and an affidavit in support of the motion. The affidavit stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10366 - 2017-09-20
filed a notice of appearance and an affidavit in support of the motion. The affidavit stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10366 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
prepayment was invalid under Wis. Stat. § 138.052. In support of the motion, she attached an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30165 - 2007-09-04
prepayment was invalid under Wis. Stat. § 138.052. In support of the motion, she attached an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30165 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
J.P. Cullen & Sons, Inc. v. Daul Industries, Inc.
of the project. ¶3 In an affidavit submitted in support of Daul Industries’ motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6120 - 2017-09-19
of the project. ¶3 In an affidavit submitted in support of Daul Industries’ motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6120 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an affidavit and itemization of these costs. The State opposed, arguing that Winston’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
an affidavit and itemization of these costs. The State opposed, arguing that Winston’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw from defense. The Estate argues that Progressive’s affidavits were inadequate. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75597 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw from defense. The Estate argues that Progressive’s affidavits were inadequate. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75597 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15973 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
County Circuit Court. ¶3 Smith also submitted an affidavit to the municipal court, in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
County Circuit Court. ¶3 Smith also submitted an affidavit to the municipal court, in which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
title to the land Hunt logged.[4] A prior owner of Wilson’s property stated in an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56770 - 2010-11-15
title to the land Hunt logged.[4] A prior owner of Wilson’s property stated in an affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56770 - 2010-11-15