Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6361 - 6370 of 68446 for did.
Search results 6361 - 6370 of 68446 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
—that the search warrant did not cover. At the hearing, the State presented evidence consisting of: (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630415 - 2023-03-08
—that the search warrant did not cover. At the hearing, the State presented evidence consisting of: (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630415 - 2023-03-08
[PDF]
State v. Lee Norman Brown
the course of his representation and was presented during the revocation proceedings. Kastenson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14656 - 2017-09-21
the course of his representation and was presented during the revocation proceedings. Kastenson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14656 - 2017-09-21
State v. Demetri Manto
identified himself and admitted that he did not have a valid driver’s license because it had been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15394 - 2005-03-31
identified himself and admitted that he did not have a valid driver’s license because it had been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15394 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
strike to remove the only African-American from Allen’s jury. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141253 - 2015-05-05
strike to remove the only African-American from Allen’s jury. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141253 - 2015-05-05
[PDF]
State v. Barry A. Schuh
that the initial contact did not constitute a stop and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 Outagamie County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2886 - 2017-09-19
that the initial contact did not constitute a stop and affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2 Outagamie County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2886 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for operating after revocation. The court did so because the court regarded those offenses as going
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181429 - 2017-09-21
for operating after revocation. The court did so because the court regarded those offenses as going
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181429 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the date of taking; (2) the court did not consider adjustments to the value of the property; (3) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54510 - 2010-09-15
the date of taking; (2) the court did not consider adjustments to the value of the property; (3) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54510 - 2010-09-15
[PDF]
Mary C. Behrndt v. Patrick Behrndt
the motion, we did hold that Patrick’s notice of appeal was not timely filed as to the April 19 judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2772 - 2017-09-19
the motion, we did hold that Patrick’s notice of appeal was not timely filed as to the April 19 judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2772 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
. 1993). The conclusion that it is directory does not mean that the legislature did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10271 - 2017-09-20
. 1993). The conclusion that it is directory does not mean that the legislature did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10271 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the facts available to the officer did not amount to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059342 - 2026-01-05
that the facts available to the officer did not amount to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059342 - 2026-01-05