Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6311 - 6320 of 67241 for had.
Search results 6311 - 6320 of 67241 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Robert Daris Spencer - 2018AP000942
court met in chambers with a juror who had become ill, without counsel present. Upon determining
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540964 - 2022-09-16
court met in chambers with a juror who had become ill, without counsel present. Upon determining
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540964 - 2022-09-16
State v. Joshua Ferry - 1994AP003065
Sagmeister, who had since arrived on the scene, to procure some written identification which would positively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8288 - 2005-03-31
Sagmeister, who had since arrived on the scene, to procure some written identification which would positively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8288 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ismet D. Divanovic - 1995AP000881
the proceedings. Bramscher informed Commissioner Parise that he had been instructed by Divanovic not to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8843 - 2017-09-19
the proceedings. Bramscher informed Commissioner Parise that he had been instructed by Divanovic not to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8843 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Pluim - 1999AP000618
house conviction, see WIS. STAT. ยง 961.42(1). No. 99-0618-CR 3 he had had a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
house conviction, see WIS. STAT. ยง 961.42(1). No. 99-0618-CR 3 he had had a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric Rodriguez - 1998AP002172
suppression motion because the trial court was biased against him and had predetermined the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14328 - 2005-03-31
suppression motion because the trial court was biased against him and had predetermined the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14328 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Fred A. Barry v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company - 1998AP002557
offices where he had been working.1 Barry argues: (1) under the safe-place statute, Ameritech had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14457 - 2017-09-21
offices where he had been working.1 Barry argues: (1) under the safe-place statute, Ameritech had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14457 - 2017-09-21
Fred A. Barry v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company - 1998AP002557
at the Ameritech offices where he had been working.[1] Barry argues: (1) under the safe-place statute, Ameritech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14457 - 2005-03-31
at the Ameritech offices where he had been working.[1] Barry argues: (1) under the safe-place statute, Ameritech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14457 - 2005-03-31
State v. Calvin Pluim - 1999AP000618
a Jamaican drug dealer in Chicago. He claimed that he had had a ten-year business relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
a Jamaican drug dealer in Chicago. He claimed that he had had a ten-year business relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald Odom - 2005AP001840
denied the motion without a hearing. In its written order, the trial court found that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25476 - 2017-09-21
denied the motion without a hearing. In its written order, the trial court found that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25476 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald Odom - 2005AP001840
that it had not erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. It also sua sponte found that excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25476 - 2006-07-25
that it had not erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. It also sua sponte found that excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25476 - 2006-07-25