Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6301 - 6310 of 35954 for affidavit of mailing.

[PDF] WI 42
signed a certified mail receipt for the letter on June 16, 2004. Although Attorney Converse called
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28751 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Chad A. Achterberg
) Notice of the order of forfeiture under sub. (1) shall be mailed forthwith by the clerk
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16972 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Manitowoc County Human Services Department v. Nancy K.
publication and mailing. However, our supreme court has assumed that chs. 801 to 847, STATS., generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13865 - 2014-09-15

State v. Stephen P. Gautschi
: …. 4. That the person may request a hearing on the revocation within 10 days by mailing or delivering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16231 - 2005-03-31

Manitowoc County Human Services Department v. Nancy K.
. See id. at 114-15, 557 N.W.2d at 802. The supreme court concluded that the mailing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13865 - 2015-05-27

[PDF] Gerardo Machado v. Shallbetter, Inc.
and by certified mail. The transmission of said offers shall only be effective upon receipt by all other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25893 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, Wisconsin. After viewing the home, Novell’s father e-mailed the Migliaccios on October 7, 2002, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26817 - 2014-09-15

Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
by serving a petition therefor personally or by certified mail upon the agency or one of its officials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14014 - 2005-03-31

State v. Matthew T. Doughty
with members outside the prison system and was subjected to having his mail searched and [he was] prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31

Manitowoc County Human Services Department v. Nancy K.
. See id. at 114-15, 557 N.W.2d at 802. The supreme court concluded that the mailing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13864 - 2007-05-16