Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 17635 for inmates search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 17635 for inmates search.
[PDF]
Ira Lee Anderson-El II v. Ave M. Bie - 1999AP000519
Ira Anderson, an inmate at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution (KMCI), appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15183 - 2017-09-21
Ira Anderson, an inmate at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution (KMCI), appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15183 - 2017-09-21
Ira Lee Anderson-El II v. Ave M. Bie - 1999AP000519
. DEININGER, J.[1] Ira Anderson, an inmate at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution (KMCI), appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31
. DEININGER, J.[1] Ira Anderson, an inmate at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution (KMCI), appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. C.S. - 2016AP001982
. was an inmate of a state prison; (4) less restrictive forms of appropriate treatment had been attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237858 - 2019-07-12
. was an inmate of a state prison; (4) less restrictive forms of appropriate treatment had been attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237858 - 2019-07-12
[PDF]
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr. - 2003AP001276
) Confinement in Prison. (a) An inmate who is serving a sentence imposed under s. 973.01 for a crime other
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
) Confinement in Prison. (a) An inmate who is serving a sentence imposed under s. 973.01 for a crime other
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17866 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Hubert Tucker, Jr. - 2003AP001276
. ¶15 We begin by examining the text of the statute, which states that it applies to "[a]n inmate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
. ¶15 We begin by examining the text of the statute, which states that it applies to "[a]n inmate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17866 - 2005-05-03
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Dan Buchler - 1994AP002712
-one days of the date the inmate receives the conduct report.1 Ledford's hearing was held April 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8182 - 2017-09-19
-one days of the date the inmate receives the conduct report.1 Ledford's hearing was held April 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8182 - 2017-09-19
William N. Ledford v. Dan Buchler - 1994AP002712
the inmate receives the conduct report.[1] Ledford's hearing was held April 12, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8182 - 2005-03-31
the inmate receives the conduct report.[1] Ledford's hearing was held April 12, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James R. Washington - 2017AP001512
challenged DOC’s increase in the deduction percentage for restitution by filing multiple inmate complaints
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240407 - 2019-05-06
challenged DOC’s increase in the deduction percentage for restitution by filing multiple inmate complaints
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240407 - 2019-05-06
James J. Kaufman v. Judy P. Smith - 2002AP000917
. Kaufman did not file an appeal or inmate complaint with respect to the decision made at the remand hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5120 - 2005-03-31
. Kaufman did not file an appeal or inmate complaint with respect to the decision made at the remand hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5120 - 2005-03-31
Berrell Freeman v. Gerald Berge - 2001AP003162
Freeman filed a complaint with the inmate complaint examiner (ICE) on May 21, 2001, asserting that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4631 - 2005-03-31
Freeman filed a complaint with the inmate complaint examiner (ICE) on May 21, 2001, asserting that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4631 - 2005-03-31