Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 631 - 640 of 68458 for did.
Search results 631 - 640 of 68458 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ground for the motion was that Nichols did not understand that he was pleading guilty to sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251073 - 2019-12-05
ground for the motion was that Nichols did not understand that he was pleading guilty to sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251073 - 2019-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Earl Applebee
The trial court did not rule on the motion, and it was denied pursuant to § 809.30(2)(i), STATS., which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11052 - 2017-09-19
The trial court did not rule on the motion, and it was denied pursuant to § 809.30(2)(i), STATS., which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11052 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Troy Lee Perkins
his pants, and exposed his “thingy” to her. Desirae K. further testified that she did not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26198 - 2017-09-21
his pants, and exposed his “thingy” to her. Desirae K. further testified that she did not believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26198 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Ferguson claimed that he did not enter his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
] postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Ferguson claimed that he did not enter his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
argues on appeal that the trial court did not equitably divide the property between the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
argues on appeal that the trial court did not equitably divide the property between the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
State v. Stanley Earl Applebee
court did not rule on the motion, and it was denied pursuant to § 809.30(2)(i), Stats., which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11052 - 2005-03-31
court did not rule on the motion, and it was denied pursuant to § 809.30(2)(i), Stats., which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11052 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
the following issues to the Supreme Court: Did the Court of Appeals deny Stietz's federal and state
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=854&year=2017
the following issues to the Supreme Court: Did the Court of Appeals deny Stietz's federal and state
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=854&year=2017
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel would not let him ask questions about restitution at sentencing. Volpendesto claimed that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116162 - 2014-07-08
counsel would not let him ask questions about restitution at sentencing. Volpendesto claimed that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116162 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it did not receive notice of the reassessment prior to the board of review meeting. ¶3 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64333 - 2014-09-15
that it did not receive notice of the reassessment prior to the board of review meeting. ¶3 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64333 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court’s plea colloquy did not comport with the standards for ensuring a knowing and voluntary plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04
that the court’s plea colloquy did not comport with the standards for ensuring a knowing and voluntary plea. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04