Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6291 - 6300 of 66224 for did.
Search results 6291 - 6300 of 66224 for did.
State v. Hayes A. Jackson - 2008AP000067
to lie to you today.” Jackson’s lawyer did not object. ¶3 Peters lived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35108 - 2009-01-06
to lie to you today.” Jackson’s lawyer did not object. ¶3 Peters lived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35108 - 2009-01-06
State v. Aaron Leslie Harmer - 2000AP000140
that § 948.025 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied. He also complains that the court did not permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2155 - 2005-03-31
that § 948.025 is unconstitutional on its face and as applied. He also complains that the court did not permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2155 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Allen - 2008AP001025
; that the allegations of the criminal complaint did not match the victims’ testimony; and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37888 - 2009-07-20
; that the allegations of the criminal complaint did not match the victims’ testimony; and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37888 - 2009-07-20
[PDF]
State v. John Allen - 2008AP001025
; that the allegations of the criminal complaint did not match the victims’ testimony; and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37888 - 2014-09-15
; that the allegations of the criminal complaint did not match the victims’ testimony; and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jeffrey Reitz - 2007AP002935
notice to Dr. D. when settlement funds were received. In some cases the law firm did inform Dr. D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38150 - 2014-09-15
notice to Dr. D. when settlement funds were received. In some cases the law firm did inform Dr. D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38150 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation, v. Diane R. Caspari - 2016AP000617
has already reimbursed the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) for fees she did not earn, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172051 - 2017-09-21
has already reimbursed the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) for fees she did not earn, we
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172051 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronald Harris - 2011AP002898
to the floor. ¶4 When the door opened, Officer Dolan asked if they could enter. Harris did not say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
to the floor. ¶4 When the door opened, Officer Dolan asked if they could enter. Harris did not say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Harris - 2011AP002898
enter. Harris did not say anything, but he took a step backwards. Officer Dolan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87090 - 2014-09-15
enter. Harris did not say anything, but he took a step backwards. Officer Dolan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Douglas J. Richer - 2013AP001826
after revocation and consuming alcohol. Richer, pro se, did not contest his revocation. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113388 - 2017-09-21
after revocation and consuming alcohol. Richer, pro se, did not contest his revocation. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113388 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas J. Richer - 2013AP001826
revocation and consuming alcohol. Richer, pro se, did not contest his revocation. Because Judge Proctor had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
revocation and consuming alcohol. Richer, pro se, did not contest his revocation. Because Judge Proctor had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02