Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6251 - 6260 of 63379 for b's.

[PDF] Applegate-Bader Farm, LLC v. DOR - 2018AP001239
and described the changes made from the initial draft rule. See § 227.19(3)(b) (describing report agency must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253205 - 2020-03-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for the public in each department.” Sec. 62.50(3)(b). We conclude it has acted within its authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616559 - 2023-01-31

[PDF] Madison Teachers, Inc. v. James R. Scott - 2016AP002214
, and the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association by 2 Dustin B. Brown, James A. Friedman, and Godfrey & Kahn
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208100 - 2018-02-06

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 19-07 supporting memo
AND AMENDING Supreme Court Rule 22.001 (6), AND CREATING Supreme Court Rules 222.001 (6) (b), 22.03 (2g
/supreme/docs/1907memo.pdf - 2019-03-14

State v. Latrina W. - 2003AP003381
. No. 02TP000132 In re the Termination of Parental Rights to Willie B., a Person Under the Age of 18: State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7151 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Latosha Armstead - 1997AP003056
is accused under the circumstances specified in s. 938.183 (1) (a), (am), (b) or (c), whichever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13160 - 2017-09-21

Victoria Jocius v. Mark Jocius - 1996AP002746
and physical placement of the children. As pertinent here, § 767.325(1)(b) reads: [U]pon petition, motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11475 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeremy Armstrong - 1998AP001768
given in s. 111.37 (1) (b). (b) “Polygraph” has the meaning given in s. 111.37 (1) (c). (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14178 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Victoria Jocius v. Mark Jocius - 1996AP002746
) governing ex parte communications. Supreme Court Rule 60.04(g)(1)a & b provides: (g) A judge shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11475 - 2017-09-19

David MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLP - 2014AP000575
decedent could claim a marital deduction on estate taxes. Dale S. Adams & Robert B. Smith, Federal Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136661 - 2015-03-04