Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6171 - 6180 of 68458 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
no longer see Crockett’s hand. The officer was concerned because he did not know if Crockett had a weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01

COURT OF APPEALS
not in “fresh pursuit” of Davis and thus did not have the authority to arrest Davis outside of campus property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66199 - 2011-06-21

State v. Susan C. Lulling
the court of unpaid restitution at least 90 days before Lulling's probation expired did not preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11115 - 2005-03-31

Barbara R.K. v. James G.
) is a necessary prerequisite to appeal a denial of a request for substitution of judge. Because Barbara did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3933 - 2011-12-11

COURT OF APPEALS
. Attorney Smith did not represent Peter B. in that case and was not familiar with its details. In 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46452 - 2010-02-02

COURT OF APPEALS
to the hospital she did not have bruises on her shoulder, buttocks, or back. Later in the evening of September 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32640 - 2008-05-13

[PDF] Rules petition 08-24
and material evidence creating a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense
/supreme/docs/0824petition.pdf - 2008-09-30

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. Luening - 2020AP002166
of misconduct did not cite EOIR rules. ¶4 Attorney Luening filed an answer to the complaint. James J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627062 - 2023-04-17

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. Luening - 2020AP002166
of misconduct did not cite EOIR rules. ¶4 Attorney Luening filed an answer to the complaint. James J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699918 - 2023-09-01

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew T. Luening - 2020AP002166
of misconduct did not cite EOIR rules. ¶4 Attorney Luening filed an answer to the complaint. James J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704482 - 2023-09-14