Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6121 - 6130 of 68445 for did.
Search results 6121 - 6130 of 68445 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion to suppress and argued that Forsyth did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38176 - 2009-07-28
a motion to suppress and argued that Forsyth did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38176 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
him for OWI. ¶4 Welch filed a motion to suppress and argued that Forsyth did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38176 - 2014-09-15
him for OWI. ¶4 Welch filed a motion to suppress and argued that Forsyth did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
took the car with him, but did not provide Newell with his Illinois address, and did not make any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154329 - 2017-09-21
took the car with him, but did not provide Newell with his Illinois address, and did not make any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154329 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy White
hitting the median wall. White did not stop. Rather, he continued driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12488 - 2005-03-31
hitting the median wall. White did not stop. Rather, he continued driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12488 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
no longer see Crockett’s hand. The officer was concerned because he did not know if Crockett had a weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
no longer see Crockett’s hand. The officer was concerned because he did not know if Crockett had a weapon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
State v. Keyun Utsey
court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26
court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Martwon Brown
claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction, and (2) his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24741 - 2017-09-21
claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction, and (2) his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24741 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney was ineffective because she did not “specifically state on the record that the non-filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
attorney was ineffective because she did not “specifically state on the record that the non-filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
did not hear a shot when Owens passed through his back yard. ¶5 Owens admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33786 - 2008-08-20
did not hear a shot when Owens passed through his back yard. ¶5 Owens admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33786 - 2008-08-20
Jon A. Haas v. Vance R. Stark
from a judgment granting Jon A. Haas a default judgment. Because the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2964 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment granting Jon A. Haas a default judgment. Because the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2964 - 2005-03-31