Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6121 - 6130 of 37267 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 6121 - 6130 of 37267 for affidavit of mailing.
COURT OF APPEALS
filing deadline because mailroom officer did not mail appeal immediately); State ex rel. Brown v. Bradley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24
filing deadline because mailroom officer did not mail appeal immediately); State ex rel. Brown v. Bradley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30704 - 2007-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Alex D. Keeton - 2009AP002865
plea. Keeton was allowed personal visits, his mail privileges were not restricted, and Keeton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58775 - 2014-09-15
plea. Keeton was allowed personal visits, his mail privileges were not restricted, and Keeton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58775 - 2014-09-15
John Jozwiak v. Ernest Sokie - 1998AP002840
or by depositing, postage or fees prepaid, in the United States mail or a commercial delivery system, not later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14576 - 2005-03-31
or by depositing, postage or fees prepaid, in the United States mail or a commercial delivery system, not later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14576 - 2005-03-31
Pattiann Reimer v. Richard Burby, Sr. - 1999AP000274
and mailed to Burby on July 25. Burby testified that he sold the vehicle approximately July 21 or 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15074 - 2005-03-31
and mailed to Burby on July 25. Burby testified that he sold the vehicle approximately July 21 or 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15074 - 2005-03-31
Silvia Reynosa v. Martha Ross - 2005AP002693
harassing Silvia Reynoso and from having any contact with Reynoso by telephone, mail, in person or by third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27118 - 2006-11-14
harassing Silvia Reynoso and from having any contact with Reynoso by telephone, mail, in person or by third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27118 - 2006-11-14
Robert J. Klingbeil v. Gustav Perschke - 1999AP000488
would not be counted because there is no mail delivery. However, that section does not apply here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15167 - 2005-03-31
would not be counted because there is no mail delivery. However, that section does not apply here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15167 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert J. Klingbeil v. Gustav Perschke - 1999AP000488
, Presidents’ Day would not be counted because there is no mail delivery. However, that section does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15167 - 2017-09-21
, Presidents’ Day would not be counted because there is no mail delivery. However, that section does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15167 - 2017-09-21
Bryce L. Garrett v. Gerald Berge - 2003AP000921
, and unauthorized use of mail. ¶3 Review on certiorari is limited to whether: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6347 - 2005-03-31
, and unauthorized use of mail. ¶3 Review on certiorari is limited to whether: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6347 - 2005-03-31
State v. Allan R. Washachek - 2000AP001094
. Washachek admitted that he had gone to the victim’s home to pick up his mail. Washachek also admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2526 - 2005-03-31
. Washachek admitted that he had gone to the victim’s home to pick up his mail. Washachek also admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2526 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allan R. Washachek - 2000AP001094
to pick up his mail. No. 00-1094-CR 3 Washachek also admitted that he “had a couple drinks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19
to pick up his mail. No. 00-1094-CR 3 Washachek also admitted that he “had a couple drinks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2526 - 2017-09-19