Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6111 - 6120 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 6111 - 6120 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
to this case. Both Leinweber and Wirth argue that if issue preclusion does not apply, as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122978 - 2014-10-01
to this case. Both Leinweber and Wirth argue that if issue preclusion does not apply, as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122978 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
Eau Claire County v. General Teamsters Union Local No. 662
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3197 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14760 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3197 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14760 - 2017-09-21
Eau Claire County v. General Teamsters Union Local No. 662
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3197
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14760 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-3197
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On November 11, 2021, while this case was still pending in the circuit court, Judson’s counsel filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
. On November 11, 2021, while this case was still pending in the circuit court, Judson’s counsel filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717354 - 2023-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to grant a default judgment in ch. 51 cases; (3) the court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568442 - 2022-09-20
to grant a default judgment in ch. 51 cases; (3) the court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568442 - 2022-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to sovereign immunity. Second, in neither of the cases did the court address the question of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26656 - 2014-09-15
to sovereign immunity. Second, in neither of the cases did the court address the question of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26656 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2019 order, the court placed this case on the expedited appeals calendar, and the parties have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250479 - 2019-11-21
, 2019 order, the court placed this case on the expedited appeals calendar, and the parties have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250479 - 2019-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or probation status. Rather, prior to trial, defense counsel moved the court to order that Xiong “be brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89781 - 2012-11-28
or probation status. Rather, prior to trial, defense counsel moved the court to order that Xiong “be brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89781 - 2012-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
argument, a circuit court judge—a judge who did not preside over Pierson’s case—found that a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
argument, a circuit court judge—a judge who did not preside over Pierson’s case—found that a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 11, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210893 - 2018-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 11, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210893 - 2018-04-11