Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6101 - 6110 of 66224 for did.

State v. Derrick Emerson - 2002AP002386
, however, the trial court did not make an express determination that a factual basis existed for Emerson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5634 - 2005-03-31

State v. Henry Bloomfield - 2002AP002390
that she had?” Ashley responded that she did not make up anything. ¶7 One of the children for whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5636 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] UHG I, LLC v. Mark Ziegler - 2022AP000712
that if the court did not assign a hearing date within two weeks of the Answer’s filing date, he would file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622126 - 2023-02-15

[PDF] State v. David Wade Givhan - 2015AP000484
-related items. Reed did not know the name of the trash collector. He did not know the number of trash
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157463 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Coleon M. Gallion - 2016AP001769
/appellate counsel did not file any postconviction motions and instead filed a no-merit report. For ease
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194333 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Robert A. Pettis - 2019AP000499
long to reopen the judgment on the basis of paternity: he did not request genetic testing until
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315515 - 2020-12-16

[PDF] Kelly L. Frank v. Alan M. Frank - 2016AP002031
[the supervisor] was friends with [the ex-wife] on Facebook.” Frank did not dispute this account in any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197716 - 2017-10-10

[PDF] State v. Latasha K. Gatlin - 2014AP000669
worried about her personal safety.” (Emphasis added.) The court stated that it did not know how
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151123 - 2017-09-21

State v. Keyun Utsey - 2004AP002578
court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26

[PDF] State v. Martwon Brown - 2005AP001078
claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction, and (2) his trial lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24741 - 2017-09-21