Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6091 - 6100 of 66937 for had.

Donald J. Parker v. Rod Buck - 2004AP001547
had occurred, the district attorney was satisfied “the remedy available in small claims would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7549 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Nancy H. Roush v. William S. Roush, Jr. - 2005AP003038
was to be deposited in a WIS. STAT. § 767.30(2) security fund because William had been unreliable in the support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32502 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert L. Albert - 2001AP001594
and the parties made their closing arguments, Albert’s lawyer told the trial court that he had just received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4075 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James M. Pope - 2016AP001191
that he and Pope had discussed how to proceed, and that Pope wanted to accept the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191400 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Olton Lee Dumas - 1996AP000913
Dumas tell Evans that his name was Walter Lee Dumas. Fahrney asked Dumas whether he had just said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10619 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. M. P. - 2016AP002105
Welfare (BMCW), 2 on April 25, 2013, after both were found to have healing fractures: N.L.P. had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197671 - 2017-10-20

[PDF] State v. Sara L. Lohry - 2003AP002248
not reasonably trustworthy and, without them therefore, the officer had no probable cause to arrest her. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6789 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Lisa L. Lappley - 2005AP000342
erred in concluding that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest her for operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19776 - 2017-09-21

State v. Olton Lee Dumas - 1996AP000913
whether he had just said that he was Walter Lee Dumas, and Dumas responded affirmatively. Fahrney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10619 - 2005-03-31

Vicky L. Stellflue v. Lloyd C. Stellflue - 1996AP001126
farms they had purchased. After the gifts, Lloyd and Donald owned these in a form of co-ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10707 - 2005-03-31