Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 66224 for did.
Search results 6061 - 6070 of 66224 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Susan C. Lulling - 1996AP002026
expired did not preclude the court from extending the probation. We further conclude that Lulling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11115 - 2017-09-19
expired did not preclude the court from extending the probation. We further conclude that Lulling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11115 - 2017-09-19
State v. Susan C. Lulling - 1996AP002026
the court of unpaid restitution at least 90 days before Lulling's probation expired did not preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11115 - 2005-03-31
the court of unpaid restitution at least 90 days before Lulling's probation expired did not preclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11115 - 2005-03-31
State v. Argyle L. Hagen - 1999AP003224
claims that the circuit court erred in denying his motion because the arresting officer did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
claims that the circuit court erred in denying his motion because the arresting officer did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Renate C. Nelson - 2004AP000742
was arrested on the child abuse charges on January 17, 2001. The trial did not commence until May 20, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18487 - 2017-09-21
was arrested on the child abuse charges on January 17, 2001. The trial did not commence until May 20, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18487 - 2017-09-21
State v. Irving Washington - 1997AP001781
did not understand the elements of the crime to which he pled. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12646 - 2005-03-31
did not understand the elements of the crime to which he pled. State v. Garcia, 192 Wis.2d 845, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12646 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peggy Kamke v. DCI Marketing, Inc. - 1998AP002253
-bearing account. Because Kamke’s employment agreement did not require cause for dismissal, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14350 - 2014-09-15
-bearing account. Because Kamke’s employment agreement did not require cause for dismissal, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14350 - 2014-09-15
Peggy Kamke v. DCI Marketing, Inc. - 1998AP002253
in a non-interest-bearing account. Because Kamke’s employment agreement did not require cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14350 - 2005-03-31
in a non-interest-bearing account. Because Kamke’s employment agreement did not require cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14350 - 2005-03-31
Kerry D. Severson v. Donald Gudmanson - 1997AP002732
the materials but did not find what he was seeking. After reviewing a catalogue Scholze had given him, Severson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13039 - 2005-03-31
the materials but did not find what he was seeking. After reviewing a catalogue Scholze had given him, Severson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13039 - 2005-03-31
Gary L. Bendix v. Linda A. Bendix - 1997AP002650
by $10,000 to $15,000. See § 767.26(5), (6). The court did not give great weight to preserving the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13006 - 2005-03-31
by $10,000 to $15,000. See § 767.26(5), (6). The court did not give great weight to preserving the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13006 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry Bowles - 1998AP003516
checks that had been issued before the joint ventures received preprinted checks. Bowles did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21
checks that had been issued before the joint ventures received preprinted checks. Bowles did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21