Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6051 - 6060 of 66224 for did.
Search results 6051 - 6060 of 66224 for did.
State v. Mark David Totzke - 2008AP002278
of the trial, the trial court found that Totzke did not meet his burden of proving the NGI defense. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46312 - 2010-02-02
of the trial, the trial court found that Totzke did not meet his burden of proving the NGI defense. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46312 - 2010-02-02
Barbara R.K. v. James G. - 2001AP001219
) is a necessary prerequisite to appeal a denial of a request for substitution of judge. Because Barbara did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3933 - 2005-03-31
) is a necessary prerequisite to appeal a denial of a request for substitution of judge. Because Barbara did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Victoria D. Roesing - 2000AP003180
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it denied the defendant’s motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3305 - 2017-09-19
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it denied the defendant’s motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3305 - 2017-09-19
State v. Victoria D. Roesing - 2000AP003180
when the State told the jury that Roesing was given her Miranda rights.[3] Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
when the State told the jury that Roesing was given her Miranda rights.[3] Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Smith - 2001AP002965
his sentencing as a repeater. He argues that the State failed to prove and he did not admit that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4555 - 2017-09-20
his sentencing as a repeater. He argues that the State failed to prove and he did not admit that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4555 - 2017-09-20
Diane Brevold v. Mark A. Brevold - 2002AP000771
paycheck over to Diane to prevent him from wasting assets on controlled substances. Mark did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5064 - 2005-03-31
paycheck over to Diane to prevent him from wasting assets on controlled substances. Mark did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5064 - 2005-03-31
John A. Vassh v. Janlyn M. Lahti - 2004AP000240
, and that Vassh did not comply with the Wisconsin Fair Debt Collection Act. The matter was tried to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7262 - 2005-03-31
, and that Vassh did not comply with the Wisconsin Fair Debt Collection Act. The matter was tried to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John A. Vassh v. Janlyn M. Lahti - 2004AP000240
was a subcontractor who should have been paid by a general contractor, and that Vassh did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7262 - 2017-09-20
was a subcontractor who should have been paid by a general contractor, and that Vassh did not comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7262 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Gerald F. Houtakker v. Carol Carew - 1995AP002996
did not believe she possessed the necessary mental capacity in February 1991 to execute a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9899 - 2017-09-19
did not believe she possessed the necessary mental capacity in February 1991 to execute a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9899 - 2017-09-19
Gerald F. Houtakker v. Carol Carew - 1995AP002996
. At the hearing on the will, Bernice's family treating physician testified that he did not believe she possessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9899 - 2005-03-31
. At the hearing on the will, Bernice's family treating physician testified that he did not believe she possessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9899 - 2005-03-31