Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6011 - 6020 of 28893 for committing.

[PDF] State v. Michael David Mattson - 2009AP000536
of evidence of other acts only when it is offered to prove propensity of the defendant to commit similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44146 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael T. Winius - 2011AP000265
. (2009-10). [1] Because Winius committed the offense in February 1999, the sentencing revisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74538 - 2011-11-28

[PDF] State v. Demetrius D. Anderson - 2007AP001415
certainty that the accused and no other person committed the offense charged.” State v. Johnson, 11 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32338 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Eric Zendejas - 2007AP002544
to additional credit, we affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Zendejas committed the present crime while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32964 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. James Podlewski - 1998AP000684
-Amendment muster if it is not “so greatly disproportionate to the offense committed as to be completely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13719 - 2014-09-15

State v. Eric Zendejas - 2007AP002544
Zendejas committed the present crime while he was on probation for two offenses. In one of those cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32964 - 2008-06-09

[PDF] State v. Austin J. Alexander - 2016AP001148
the no-merit report. A criminal complaint charged Alexander with committing one count of using a computer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175022 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. K.M. - 2020AP001524
. appeals from an order extending her commitment due to mental illness. She argues this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589683 - 2022-11-15

[PDF] State v. Brenden S. Paquette - 2014AP001543
that a circuit court may not justify the DNA surcharge because a defendant might, in the future, “commit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132018 - 2017-09-21

State v. Brenden S. Paquette - 2014AP001543
a defendant might, in the future, “commit a crime that would generate costs for DNA analysis.” Here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132018 - 2014-12-22