Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6001 - 6010 of 98201 for circuit court.
Search results 6001 - 6010 of 98201 for circuit court.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: DAVID CONWAY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737692 - 2023-12-12
an order of the circuit court for Dane County: DAVID CONWAY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737692 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for St. Croix County: EDWARD F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172158 - 2017-09-21
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for St. Croix County: EDWARD F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
at disposition. Whether the circuit court improperly relied on the adoptive parent’s assurance that she would
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824112 - 2024-07-08
at disposition. Whether the circuit court improperly relied on the adoptive parent’s assurance that she would
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824112 - 2024-07-08
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
State v. B. W. Whether a circuit court’s plea colloquy is defective when it miscommunicates
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830460 - 2024-07-22
State v. B. W. Whether a circuit court’s plea colloquy is defective when it miscommunicates
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830460 - 2024-07-22
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. § 6.855(5), which permits multiple sites. But the circuit court held that Racine erred in establishing
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853950 - 2024-09-20
. § 6.855(5), which permits multiple sites. But the circuit court held that Racine erred in establishing
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853950 - 2024-09-20
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
. § 6.855(5), which permits multiple sites. But the circuit court held that Racine erred in establishing
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855976 - 2024-09-25
. § 6.855(5), which permits multiple sites. But the circuit court held that Racine erred in establishing
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855976 - 2024-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326422 - 2021-01-21
an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326422 - 2021-01-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186656 - 2017-09-21
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104433 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104433 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Lafayette County: JAMES R. BEER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165255 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for Lafayette County: JAMES R. BEER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165255 - 2017-09-21